Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Article on Hammond Middle School Running Track in Local Paper "Alexandria Gazette"

Effort to Replace Hammond Middle School Running Track
Reaches Attention of Local Media


Text of Article

A Marathon Campaign
Gary Carr talks about his years of
crusading for an improved track
at Hammond Middle School.
By Michael Lee Pope Gazette Packet

A native of Cincinnati, Ohio, Gary Carr has lived in Alex since 1986. He’s an electroneurodiagnostictechnologist at the Alexandria Professional Building,where his ninth-floor office looks down at Hammond Middle School. Since 2002, Carr has advocated for improving the track facilities at meetings of the City Council, School Board, Planning Commission and Park and Recreation Commission.

What happened to the track at Hammond when the school system renovated the building in ’02?
The original track at Hammond was from when the school had been a high school, so it had a six-lane 400 meter track. Of course, it had eroded over time, but it was still a good facility. But then the renovation happened, the track was used as a staging area. To my bewilderment, when the renovation was finished they put an elementary school playground there. Essentially the track was replaced by a meandering path. And what I’ve been able to observe from my vantage point at the Alexandria Professional Building is that the entire field floods every time it rains. The
field turns into a muddy mess. So I started to speak out about it, and I thought it was going to be kind of an easy thing — that I would talk about it a few times and they would fix it and that
would be that.

What happened?
Since I’ve been speaking out about this issue, the city has fixed the field at Fort Ward and
they’ve fixed the field at Minnie Howard — all to the neglect of the field at Hammond. That’s
when I came to the realization that nobody was really speaking out about this issue, and I
felt this was a really important issue from the children’s standpoint. Because I work in the
medical field, my argument became interwoven with the childhood obesity epidemic.
There’s no doubt about the need for this track at Hammond. So my crusade became
restoring the track at Hammond in an effort to battle childhood obesity and the sedentary
lifestyle.


Why is this needed?
There’s an immediate need at Hammond because of the condition of the field. Every time it
rains, the field floods and it’s unusable to a thousand kids. The need at Hammond is really
significant, and I don’t understand why nobody seems to care about it. So that’s what really
got me riled up because I’ve seen other projects advance but nobody is really advocating for
the kids at Hammond.

You’ve been speaking out about this for years and yet nothing has happened. Why do you think that’s the case?
I really don’t know to be honest, but I find it curious that nothing has happened because this affects so many children. But the PTA Council is not talking about it. I honestly don’t get
it why nobody seems to care about this because the need is so apparent. It’s one of those
things that’s invisible in plain sight. I’ve tried every argument I can think of.

When do you think this will be resolved?
Based on the current economic conditions, I’m not optimistic to tell you the truth. I think this issue is moving forward, but it’s not moving very fast. It’s possible this will get fixed when the economy gets better. But when will that be?

Are you going to keep speaking out about this?
I’ve decided to stop on four different occasions, and I even publicly announced that I was
going to stop speaking about this. But I’ve become committed to seeing this through. I
have made this my public service. I believe this is something I can make a strong case for, and
it’s something that will have a very positive effect. The discipline that’s required to run is
exactly what kids need today.

The Emperors New Clothes- Part II

The Emperor's New Clothes- Part II
Statement to the Alexandria City School Board
About the City's Running Tracks
.
I am sure you are weary of speakers coming before you with all complains and no solutions.
As for a plan of action, let me suggest to you this. Proceed with a assessment for construction of a state-of-the-art 8-lane track and field facility at T.C. Williams. If for some reason that proves too problematic to achieve, “restore” the track and field at TC, and then immediately look elsewhere in the city to place an 8-lane track facility.
You initially need not look further than our two Middle Schools, shackled with meandering trails that should not even reasonably be referred to as “tracks”. George Washington Middle School offers a great opportunity. There used to be a track at GW, but somehow during the school’s renovation and expansion, it was lost. In its place is a pathetic, uneven, narrow trail around the field, barely two people wide. GW’s proximity to the Metro makes it a site worthy of consideration. Hammond Middle School also offers a great opportunity resulting from benign neglect. The upper field adjacent to the school is in dismal shape. A good intentioned, yet misdirected, path substitutes for what should really be there. Distances at both are marked poorly, or not at all. While the proposal to install artificial turf field at both schools is nice, the missing element is the addition of quality running tracks.
What is being proposed is three tracks, one at the high school and one at each middle school. One should be an 8-lane state-of-the-art facility for track and field that would rival any in the nation. (example diagram enclosed). It should include hurtles, and all other track equipment and the latest digital timing devices. The other two should be regulation 6 lane asphalt ovals, perfectly flat and lined, 400 meters in distance, with two 100 meter curves and two 100 meter straightaways with run-outs on both sides. These could be constructed quickly, with a relatively minimal amount of time and expense. They are essentially quarter-mile roads of blacktop and paint. At least one should be constructed before the beginning of next season. If an 8-lane cannot be built at the High School, where it rightfully belongs, then a fourth track should be built at Potomac Yards or anywhere, just built it somewhere.
The beauty of this proposal is that does not diminish our field inventory one bit. It will not prevent or restrict the turf, bleacher or irrigation projects, now or in the future. It in fact enhances the fields, putting them to a greater and better use. We have a rare chance to race ahead of our competition (pun intended), and move our facilities from last place to first place. A new, fully outfitted competition level 8-lane track and additional 6-lane tracks might be initially costly, but it will have a great payback in positive economic benefits to the school system and city as a whole.
I must turn to the issue of cost. At the risk of alienating my friends in the rowing community, before it is said we can’t afford this, I will use the Rowing Center as example in a cost-benefit analysis. How many students are able to take advantage of the Rowing Center- maybe 5%? (the ACPS Facility Data Sheet does not account for student enrollment). How many students will use the track – 100%. How many in the community could or would use the rowing center- 5%? How many use the track- 100%. How many attend rowing events during the year -5%; how many would attend track track, at least 50% or more. How often can the rowing facility be used? Maybe half a year at best simply based on weather, 365 days a year for a track- rain or shine.
I reiterate I have nothing against rowing. This is just an example of cost-versus-benefit in an era of scarcity. Let it not be said that we can’t afford three new tracks that benefits the vast majority of students, and then turn around and allow of vote for $781,860 dollars for a Rowing Center that benefits relatively few. These expenditures are on top of the $1,248,100 spent to purchase the property and another $500,000 already spent to renovate the center. That’s 2.5 million dollars on a facility that may be meritorious, but all the while we have spent next to nothing on our running track infrastructure. Track and Field should achieve an individual budget line status, with many items having a project priority labeled “essential”. This will assure the long term health of this endeavor, so that after they are built, they will be regularly upgraded and maintained.
You should also partner with members of the Parks and Recreation Community, who should willingly assist with the planning and funding. The recently released “Comprehensive Athletic Field Master Plan” initial draft report incredulously make no mention of running tracks, or include tracks in its recommended improvements. What it does say is spend $20 million dollars and still have not tracks. What it does say is that Alexandria City park and recreation facilities are among the “most used” in the region and “unable to meet current demand.” What it does say is that over half of the fields are at the schools, or used by them on a regular basis. This begs for a re-evaluation, with close cooperations between all recreation and school related organizations, to achieve the maximum benefit for our residents.
The tracks at our schools have languished and fell into dismal disrepair at T.C. Williams High School, George Washington and Hammond Middle Schools. We have a chance to build something that will effect the quality of life of students and citizens for generations to come. A track is as much a part of the school as a gymnasium. It is a much a part of the community as a park. Not everybody plays baseball, lacrosse, soccer or football. Everybody walks, jogs, or runs. Even wheelchairs, bicycles and strollers can be used on a track. After years of delay, the tracks should be completed with all deliberate speed. We pontificate about sedentary lifestyles of our students and citizenry, not often do we have a chance to truly have a meaningful and long-term positive impact. Let our actions speak as loud as our words.
Build three running tracks worthy of the magnificent new school, and all of our great school renovations. If we do not, we will be left with invisible clothes, while the people say “Oh what great school facilities we have in Alexandria”, when in fact our “new clothes” will be a suit without a lining.

I am sure you are weary of speakers coming before you with all complains and no solutions.
As for a plan of action, let me suggest to you this. Proceed with a assessment for construction of a state-of-the-art 8-lane track and field facility at T.C. Williams. If for some reason that proves too problematic to achieve, “restore” the track and field at TC, and then immediately look elsewhere in the city to place an 8-lane track facility.
You initially need not look further than our two Middle Schools, shackled with meandering trails that should not even reasonably be referred to as “tracks”. George Washington Middle School offers a great opportunity. There used to be a track at GW, but somehow during the school’s renovation and expansion, it was lost. In its place is a pathetic, uneven, narrow trail around the field, barely two people wide. GW’s proximity to the Metro makes it a site worthy of consideration. Hammond Middle School also offers a great opportunity resulting from benign neglect. The upper field adjacent to the school is in dismal shape. A good intentioned, yet misdirected, path substitutes for what should really be there. Distances at both are marked poorly, or not at all. While the proposal to install artificial turf field at both schools is nice, the missing element is the addition of quality running tracks.
What is being proposed is three tracks, one at the high school and one at each middle school. One should be an 8-lane state-of-the-art facility for track and field that would rival any in the nation. (example diagram enclosed). It should include hurtles, and all other track equipment and the latest digital timing devices. The other two should be regulation 6 lane asphalt ovals, perfectly flat and lined, 400 meters in distance, with two 100 meter curves and two 100 meter straightaways with run-outs on both sides. These could be constructed quickly, with a relatively minimal amount of time and expense. They are essentially quarter-mile roads of blacktop and paint. At least one should be constructed before the beginning of next season. If an 8-lane cannot be built at the High School, where it rightfully belongs, then a fourth track should be built at Potomac Yards or anywhere, just built it somewhere.
The beauty of this proposal is that does not diminish our field inventory one bit. It will not prevent or restrict the turf, bleacher or irrigation projects, now or in the future. It in fact enhances the fields, putting them to a greater and better use. We have a rare chance to race ahead of our competition (pun intended), and move our facilities from last place to first place. A new, fully outfitted competition level 8-lane track and additional 6-lane tracks might be initially costly, but it will have a great payback in positive economic benefits to the school system and city as a whole.
I must turn to the issue of cost. At the risk of alienating my friends in the rowing community, before it is said we can’t afford this, I will use the Rowing Center as example in a cost-benefit analysis. How many students are able to take advantage of the Rowing Center- maybe 5%? (the ACPS Facility Data Sheet does not account for student enrollment). How many students will use the track – 100%. How many in the community could or would use the rowing center- 5%? How many use the track- 100%. How many attend rowing events during the year -5%; how many would attend track track, at least 50% or more. How often can the rowing facility be used? Maybe half a year at best simply based on weather, 365 days a year for a track- rain or shine.
I reiterate I have nothing against rowing. This is just an example of cost-versus-benefit in an era of scarcity. Let it not be said that we can’t afford three new tracks that benefits the vast majority of students, and then turn around and allow of vote for $781,860 dollars for a Rowing Center that benefits relatively few. These expenditures are on top of the $1,248,100 spent to purchase the property and another $500,000 already spent to renovate the center. That’s 2.5 million dollars on a facility that may be meritorious, but all the while we have spent next to nothing on our running track infrastructure. Track and Field should achieve an individual budget line status, with many items having a project priority labeled “essential”. This will assure the long term health of this endeavor, so that after they are built, they will be regularly upgraded and maintained.
You should also partner with members of the Parks and Recreation Community, who should willingly assist with the planning and funding. The recently released “Comprehensive Athletic Field Master Plan” initial draft report incredulously make no mention of running tracks, or include tracks in its recommended improvements. What it does say is spend $20 million dollars and still have not tracks. What it does say is that Alexandria City park and recreation facilities are among the “most used” in the region and “unable to meet current demand.” What it does say is that over half of the fields are at the schools, or used by them on a regular basis. This begs for a re-evaluation, with close cooperations between all recreation and school related organizations, to achieve the maximum benefit for our residents.
The tracks at our schools have languished and fell into dismal disrepair at T.C. Williams High School, George Washington and Hammond Middle Schools. We have a chance to build something that will effect the quality of life of students and citizens for generations to come. A track is as much a part of the school as a gymnasium. It is a much a part of the community as a park. Not everybody plays baseball, lacrosse, soccer or football. Everybody walks, jogs, or runs. Even wheelchairs, bicycles and strollers can be used on a track. After years of delay, the tracks should be completed with all deliberate speed. We pontificate about sedentary lifestyles of our students and citizenry, not often do we have a chance to truly have a meaningful and long-term positive impact. Let our actions speak as loud as our words.
Build three running tracks worthy of the magnificent new school, and all of our great school renovations. If we do not, we will be left with invisible clothes, while the people say “Oh what great school facilities we have in Alexandria”, when in fact our “new clothes” will be a suit without a lining.

The Emperors New Clothes- Part I:My First In-Depth Writings on Running Tracks

Note: This was my first extended writing on the issue in 2006
.
The Emperor's New Clothes- Part II
Statement to the Alexandria City School Board
About the City's Running Tracks
.

My name is Gary Carr. I am the owner of Gary Photo, and a resident of the City for more that 20 years. I have two school-age children in the system- one in the eighth grade and one in kindergarten.
I have been along time advocate of governmental agencies – especially the schools, recreation centers and libraries- working together collaboratively to nurture our children’s development. I come here believing I represent the interest of the more than ten thousand students- public and private- in the city.
I recognized long ago, that while you can’t solve all of the problems in the world, it should not prevent you from trying to solve one. My one issue today is running tracks. Or more directly the lack thereof, and the inadequate solutions that are being proposed. While I commend you for the recent initiatives to actually fund the “restoration” of the running track at T.C. Williams, it does not go far enough. This city does not need one restored track- it needs three. One at the high school and one at each middle school. One of these tracks should be built to competition level, and fully outfitted with the most modern track equipment, either at the schools or somewhere else in the city.
I will begin my comments the by paraphrasing the book “The Emperor’s New Clothes” by Hans Christian Anderson, “but he has no clothes on” a child finally exclaimed to the chagrin of the nude emperor. I am sure you have have had this tale read to you, read it to someone else, or know the story.
How do I relate that story with what is going on with the tracks in this City? Well, I will contend that Alexandria is naked when it come to tracks, while we are being told by the tailor it will soon be fully clothed. There are currently no quality track facilities in the city for public use- none. Alexandria is a city of more that 130,000 population without an accessible competition level 8-lane track facility. While we are told we will soon have a fine wardrobe for our schools, in fact outside we are bare.
Currently we have two projects under-construction or consideration that portent to address the running track issue. They do not. They are undergarments at best.
One is the new Parker-Gray Stadium at T.C. Williams High School. The 2008 ACPS Capital Improvement Budget plans currently calls for the “restoration” of the 6 lane track there, with no mention of the middle schools or any other track facilities. Six lanes may be appropriate for practice and training, but not a real competition. When our students compete at the “Meet” level, they are always hosted at an 8-lane track. For most children in the local region, public or private school, the only time they ever see an 8-lane facility is at a completion. This puts them all at a distinct disadvantage. This is especially true in the 200 meter and 400 meter races which have staggered starts. You need to practice in the same type of arena in which you will play. An 8-lane track benefits every child in the community, from the handicapped and disadvantaged, to the most affluent or potential Olympians. I could even cite many Standards of Learning and other educational benefits (such as why some races over 100 meters have offset starting places, the conversion of meters to feet, or time over distance measurements- with real world applications).
Rightfully, the 8-lane track belongs at T.C. Williams High School. Arguments against placing 8-lanes there is the need to make the playing field smaller or perhaps lose some seating capacity. That should not be an obstacle. Field size is not effected by the track the inner dimension is standard. The loss of space around the perimeter amounts to 3 yards. Ten feet makes a world of difference. Because it is often said something can’t be done, and it you don’t know any better, you conclude they are correct. I contend that it can be done, why it should be done and how. (See diagram) Bleachers could be lowered and extend further around the perimeter. Barriers could be erected where necessary. Make it tighter, but make it complete. If it does require closer quarters, when visiting teams come to Alexandria, they will know what it means to have home-field advantage. To those who will object to “having it in their back yard”, I ask you look at the good it provides to the greater community.
CONTINUED IN PART 2

8 Lane Running Tracks vs 6-Lanes

Which is bettter? 6-Lanes or 8-Lanes?



This is the point where I will start publishing statements that have been presented over the years before the city council and school board in support of the restoration of the running tracks At Francis Hammond and George Washington Middle Schools in Alexandria, Virginia.

When Is Six Better Than Eight?
STATEMENT TO THE ALEXANDRIA CITY COUNCIL
JUNE 14, 2008
Why Do the call it Track and Field instead of Field and Track? If it followed the long standing norm, the preeminent subject comes first. Logically that would make track a priority. Where as the running track facility allows for year round usage from a larger range of the population, a fields serves team sports in limited seasons, with a limited number of people. But field sports are well organized by definition, where as track activities are loosely affiliated or individual activities. While a strong case could be made simply on the merits, that a track is a better investment for a community, fields organization inevitably hold political sway. But a track does not de-Track (sic- detract, pun intended) from a field, on every level it could be argued that a track enhances any field design. Yet here we are a community of 136,174 without a single competitive running track. The rueful irony is that this is a running, jogging and walking community. It has been is this woeful state for many years too long.
We can rightfully rejoice that the running track and field is finally being restored a the new T.C. Williams High School after a prolonged absence. While this is notable, it does not fully address the need of our community. It does not address the lack of a facility to the east end or west end of the city. It will not be available to the community during school hours, or even after school in many cases because of organized activities. It does not have lights, so it can't be used after dark or in short days of winter. So we have a silver lining, but are still left with the cloud.
We must restore the track at our middle schools for numerous reasons, many I have previously articulated. But more than that, we should build a 8-lane facility somewhere with in our city's limits that would serve a greater public good. If not for health and fitness, then simple economics. I thereby request that a study be instituted to measure the economic impact of hosting a regional or state wide track meet would have on the city. Not to prejudge the result, but I anticipate the return on investment would be considerable. Opportunities are few in our city for such a complex, and the challenges are great. The proposed “All-City Sports” facility is not the answer, with its lack of a track and parking. A chance is being squandered at Potomac Yards, where the design precludes a track now or in the future. Looking at the landscape, it appears the land in conjunction with the George Washington Middle School Site, with its location and proxmity to Metro, might represent the best and perhaps last chance to construct a worthy facility. Hopefully, this opportunity wiil not be ignored. I have this vision that as a result of the action you take, at the 2016 Olympics potentially in Chicago, the announcer is saying “and hailing from Alexandria, Virginia” (insert you child or grandchild's name here)...
For if we build it, they will run.


The New T.C. Williams High School Track


This is the beautiful new running track at the new T.C. Williams High School. As nice as it is, several deficiencies were noted prior to construction, to no avail. One was building it to championship level 8-lane specifications. A somewhat specious argument stated that it could not be done. It was constructed in such a way as to preclude it ever becoming 8-lanes (note the retaining wall at the far end of the picture).
.
The other deficiency is a lack of lighting; 100 million was spent on the new high school, and the field and track has no lighting. The lack of lighting, even the low illumination type, drastically reduces a tracks usability in the evenings, and in the winter months when in gets dark early.